Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jane's avatar

I would add some caution to the interpretation of the HBOT paper discussed. The original study included sham HBOT as a control group but only short term followup. Patients who received sham were offered HBOT so could not be included in the long term followup for this study. So the only conclusion is that patients who received HBOT felt better a year later, but there could be any number of reasons for this, and difficult to prove it was the HBOT alone that contributed.

Expand full comment
Nope Nope's avatar

@Brandon,

I tried to get a paid subscription but it looks like that isn’t an option. Do you know how I can help support this newsletter?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts